why did this asshole give his critique of a poem its own poetic title
bcz he is a talky talk man
this peer-written critique of a peer’s poem about being diagnosed with AIDS is titled “they’ll not say it’s all about blowjobs and glitter” [which has nothing to do with any of the lines or the tone/subject of the poem] [the critique writer is a 30-something white dude that talks forever and always]
"White men make up approximately 36% of the population, but commit 75% of mass shootings. What would be called terrorism by any other skin tone is suddenly some mysterious unnamed disease. We as a society are perfectly happy to further stigmatize mentally ill people, who are far more likely to be victims of violence than commit violence, in the service of protecting white supremacy and male entitlement."
Resubmitting this because the original did not cite the original author, and plagirizing of WoC’s work is a serious and rampant issue. We cannot allow them to do this difficult work without acknowledging the value of their work. If you reblogged, please delete the original and reblog this version.
do you ever wonder how many people have had a crush on you and never told you
religious homophobes think that as long as they’re polite about their hateful views it’s not gonna count as hate well it does and it literally kills people and you stay silent with that “I love you but I don’t support your lifestyle” you don’t fucking deserve the right to say you love us it’s a goddamn LIE
Actually, it is just their views and beliefs. If you don’t agree with them, who cares? Why would you allow anyone else’s opinion define who you are?
because it literally fucking kills people all right